Controversy reigned supreme at the Emirates Stadium as Bayern Munich, led by a fuming Thomas Tuchel, decried a denied penalty decision.

Yet, the Germans’ outrage appears selective, conveniently overlooking Harry Kane’s red-card offence and a clear foul on Bukayo Saka in the penalty area in the last seconds. Questions linger about refereeing inconsistencies and whether Arsenal were victims of unfair officiating.

Bayern Munich's German goalkeeper #01 Manuel Neuer tackles Arsenal's English midfielder #07 Bukayo Saka during the UEFA Champions League quarter final first-leg football match between Arsenal and Bayern Munich at the Arsenal Stadium, in north London, on April 9, 2024.  (Photo by IAN KINGTON/IKIMAGES/AFP via Getty Images)
Bayern Munich’s German goalkeeper #01 Manuel Neuer tackles Arsenal’s English midfielder #07 Bukayo Saka during the UEFA Champions League quarter final first-leg football match between Arsenal and Bayern Munich at the Arsenal Stadium, in north London, on April 9, 2024. (Photo by IAN KINGTON/IKIMAGES/AFP via Getty Images)

A pulsating Champions League encounter at the Emirates Stadium ended 2-2, but the post-match narrative is dominated by selective outrage from Bayern Munich. While Thomas Tuchel fumes over a handball incident, conveniently ignored are Harry Kane’s red-card-worthy elbow and a penalty denied to Bukayo Saka – leaving Arsenal fans feeling shortchanged.

The flashpoint arrived when Gabriel Magalhaes picked up the ball within his own area following a David Raya goal kick. Bayern‘s players, led by Tuchel, erupted in fury, demanding a penalty. However, Swedish referee Glenn Nyberg remained unmoved, reportedly explaining his decision as a “kid’s mistake” unworthy of a penalty in a high-pressure Champions League tie.

Tuchel’s post-match tirade was scathing: “I know it is a crazy situation but they put the ball down, he whistles, he gives the ball and the defender takes the ball in his hand,” Tuchel said.

“What makes us really angry is the explanation on the field. He told our players that it is a ‘kid’s mistake’ and he will not give a penalty like this in a quarter-final. This is a horrible, horrible explanation. He is judging handballs. Kid’s mistake, adult’s mistake. Whatever. We feel angry because it is a huge decision against us.”

However, his outrage seemed strangely selective. The Bayern coach conveniently overlooked a deliberate elbow from Kane on Gabriel that could, and should, have easily resulted in a red card. Similarly, a late tackle on Saka in the box, which left the young Gunner writhing in pain, went unpunished by the referee, with Arsenal‘s penalty appeals falling on deaf ears.

The contrasting treatment of the two penalty incidents highlights the bias of the media that are running hard on Tuchel’s comments while accusing Saka of diving. While a clear handball by Gabriel, albeit unintentional, wasn’t penalised, a strong case could be made for both a red card for Kane and a penalty for Saka. This inconsistency leaves a bitter taste for Arsenal fans, who witnessed their team’s valiant fightback overshadowed by questionable officiating.

Despite the controversy, the tie remains very much alive. Arsenal, fuelled by a sense of injustice, will travel to Munich with a fighting chance. While Bayern might feel aggrieved over the handball decision, they cannot ignore the questionable calls that went their way.

The Gunners must channel their frustration into a focused performance at the Allianz Arena. If they can overcome not only a formidable Bayern side but also any potential officiating bias, a famous Champions League victory remains a possibility.