World Cup ref got the rules wrong with Almiron booking

Fans were rightly confused when Miguel Almiron was booked during Paraguay’s match against the United States, as the rules were reportedly applied incorrectly.

There was significant confusion during the United States’ win over Paraguay, when referee Danny Makkelie overturned his yellow card to Tim Ream after a VAR review, awarding a booking to Miguel Almiron for simulation instead.

The first point of contention was the fact Makkelie was reviewing the play after the game had already restarted from the free-kick. In general, once play restarts, VAR can no longer intervene.

This was explained by the suggestion that this was a case of ‘mistaken identity’. In cases of mistaken identity, as well as in cases of some red card offences, VAR can intervene even if play has restarted. This is not the case for goals, penalties, and so on.

But the question then is why this was considered a case of mistaken identity. Makkelie didn’t mistakenly believe that Ream had dived (as Almiron had done), he thought Ream had committed a foul.

So he’d misjudged the play, but not because he was confused about the identity of the players. Makkelie didn’t spot a foul but mess up who committed it, he called a foul when a player dived.

The argument presented in the immediate aftermath of the match was that the incident still counted as mistaken identity because the referee had punished the wrong team. But by that logic, almost all incorrectly-awarded free-kicks could be reviewed, even after play restarts.

Simon Stone reports for the BBC that well-placed sources have confirmed that this was an incorrect use of VAR by Makkelie.

The offence itself shouldn’t even have been reviewed by the referee, only the identity of the players involved. And as the identity of the players wasn’t the issue, a review never should have been recommended in the first place.

There hasn’t been significant outrage about the decision, as it was ultimately the right call. Almiron did dive, Ream didn’t deserve a yellow for a foul he didn’t commit, so justice was done.

But VAR shouldn’t have intervened in this case, and it will open up a can of worms if FIFA stand by the decision. Almost all refereeing calls could be reviewed at any time, a situation the football lawmakers (and indeed football fans) have always been keen to avoid.

So far, FIFA haven’t clarified the situation, likely hoping they can just ignore the incident until people stop caring. This World Cup has already drawn plenty of negative PR for the football organisation, they don’t need more headlines about how they’re messing things up.

• Arsenal and Hamburg in price standoff over €20m midfielder clause
  Hamburg want Fabio Vieira back after his Arsenal loan, but will only pay around half the agreed €20m option fee.
• Arsenal exit talk cools as injury complicates interest
  Ben White’s Arsenal future is reportedly clouded by injury despite Premier League interest from Everton and Crystal Palace.
• Arsenal contract talks continue without breakthrough for 2
  Arsenal are yet to reach a breakthrough in contract talks with Alex Marciniak and Josh Ogunnaike, with both players’ deals expiring at the end of June.
• Arsenal target questions £130m valuation
  Morgan Rogers has questioned his reported £130m valuation after Arsenal stepped back from a possible move for the Aston Villa forward.
• Arsenal winger offered €9m salary as €20m fee accepted
  Besiktas are reportedly ready to offer Leandro Trossard €9m a year after agreeing a transfer fee with Arsenal.