'.

Arsenal accused of ignoring Rwanda pleas

Arsenal’s £10 million-a-year “Visit Rwanda” sponsorship is under intense scrutiny as the club faces diplomatic backlash for ignoring calls to sever ties with Rwanda.

With the UN, G7, and UK officials condemning Rwanda’s role in human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo, pressure is mounting on the club to act.

As Bayern Munich and Paris Saint-Germain also face growing criticism over their Rwandan partnerships, Arsenal’s silence is becoming impossible to justify.

Arsenal accused of diplomatic snub over ‘bloodstained’ Rwanda contract Club ignored request to discuss controversial sponsorship deal with DRC foreign minister The Observer16 Feb 2025Mark Townsend Getty ABOVE Arsenal, who have a huge African fanbase, wearing the Visit Rwanda logo on their shirt sleeves. Arsenal has been accused of delivering an “outrageous” snub to the Congolese government by not meeting the country’s foreign minister to discuss the football club’s controversial sponsorship deal with Rwanda. Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, foreign minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), was in London this week to raise concerns over Rwanda’s support for the M23 militia that has seized swathes of territory in eastern DRC. Wagner said she attempted to meet Arsenal officials to discuss the club’s Visit Rwanda sponsorship deal. However, Arsenal, one of the world’s most popular Premier League clubs with a large fanbase in Africa, chose not to respond, she said. UN experts have said that 3,000 to 4,000 Rwandan government military personnel have operated alongside M23 in eastern DRC. However, Rwanda continues to deny its forces have crossed into the country and or any involvement in supporting the M23 rebels. Wagner said: “We offered to meet Arsenal, but they didn’t reach out or take us up on the offer. We have not received an answer. Apparently they are not interested in meeting us.” A member of a Congolese diaspora group in London, who requested not to be named, said Arsenal’s response was an “outrageous insult” to what they said were “millions” of fans in a country the size of western Europe. In contrast, another leading club with the same Rwandan sponsorship deal – Germany’s Bayern Munich – sent two employees to Rwanda to monitor the situation and is in contact with the German foreign ministry. Before Wagner arrived in London she urged the owners of Arsenal to end what she called its “bloodstained” deal with Visit Rwanda. The deal, running since 2021, is believed to be worth £10m a year and will continue until next year. Visit Rwanda is an arm of the Rwanda Development Board, a government department. Rwanda’s president, Paul Kagame, is also head of its military. Last week, the Guardian exposed the extent of Rwanda’s involvement in the M23 offensive, revealing that hundreds, possibly thousands, of its troops had been killed during clandestine missions in the Congo. Rwandan troops led by the M23 recently seized the Congolese city of Goma, and are now moving south in an offensive experts warn threatens to deepen a humanitarian catastrophe with about 700,000 people forced from their homes already this year. Signs of a concerted international response to the crisis have been slow, but on Thursday the European parliament urged the EU to freeze direct budget support for Rwanda until it breaks links with the M23 rebels. The UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, last month warned that Rwanda had put $1bn of global aid under threat by taking part in the invasion of the DRC. No funding, however, appears to have been withdrawn as yet. Wagner said: “Condemnations and declarations have had a limcurtailns limited impact when it comes to curtailing President Kagame’s actions and ambitions.” Wagner met Lammy and Africa minister Lord Collins of Highbury ury this week and said there was a “continuous ontinuhe conversation” in which she was pushing for action. “There is still an imperative ive for sanctions and firm action. We have a situation where a country is s occuhich occupying another country and which is pillaging natural resources, is responsible espont for the killing of at least 3,000 civilians and also peacekeepers. rs. The ‘The killing has to stop, the pillaging has to stop. The crooks have to leave the DRC’ Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, foreign minister killing has to stop, the pillaging has to stop. The crooks have to leave the DRC,” Wagner said. Another big European football club – Paris St-Germain – is also under pressure because of its Visit Rwanda deal, with former DRC captain Youssouf Mulumbu asking it to reconsider its partnership. This week, the DRC also urged Formula One to end talks with Rwanda over hosting a race, saying the motor sport risks having its brand “smeared by a bloodstained association”. Arsenal’s deal with Visit Rwanda began in May 2018, when it signed a three-year y deal with the Rwanda Development Develop Board, followed by another in 2021. Its logo appears on the shirt sleeves of Arsenal’s men’s, women’s and youth teams and can be seen on boards at the Emirates Stadium and on interview backdrops. Part of o the deal has seen past and present Arsenal A players visit Rwanda, most notably no during August 2022 when the th club published footage on its channels chan of former midfielders Ray Parl Parlour and Robert Pires kayaking ing on La Lake Kivu and playing golf. Arsenal Arsena did not respond to requests for comm comment. Article Name:Arsenal accused of diplomatic snub over ‘bloodstained’ Rwanda contract Publication:The Observer Author:Mark Townsend Start Page:18 End Page:18
The Observer, 16 February 2025 – Arsenal accused of diplomatic snub over ‘bloodstained’ Rwanda contract

Arsenal is facing mounting international pressure to sever its £10 million-a-year sponsorship deal with Rwanda amid allegations of the country’s direct involvement in human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The controversy deepened this week after Arsenal was accused of snubbing a diplomatic request from DRC Foreign Minister Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, who sought to discuss the club’s ties to Rwanda’s tourism campaign, “Visit Rwanda.”

Wagner, who was in London for talks with UK officials regarding Rwanda’s alleged support for M23 rebels, confirmed that Arsenal failed to respond to her request for a meeting. Wagner said: “We offered to meet Arsenal, but they didn’t reach out or take us up on the offer. We have not received an answer. Apparently they are not interested in meeting us.”

She had previously written to the club, urging it to reconsider its association with a government accused of war crimes, stating: “Your sponsor is directly responsible for this misery. If not for your own consciences, then do it for the victims of Rwandan aggression.”

The UN, G7 nations, and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy have all condemned Rwanda’s role in the escalating conflict, which has left nearly 3,000 people dead in Goma and led to mass displacement. Reports from UN peacekeepers have documented war crimes, including mass executions, sexual violence, and the burning of women alive in a Congolese prison following a rebel attack. The European Parliament has now urged the EU to freeze budget support for Rwanda until it breaks ties with M23.

In stark contrast to Arsenal’s silence, Bayern Munich, another club sponsored by Rwanda, has sent representatives to the country to assess the situation and is in contact with the German foreign ministry.

Paris Saint-Germain is also facing pressure to reconsider its Rwandan partnership.

Despite the growing international outcry, Arsenal has remained unresponsive. With £600 million in annual revenue, the club has little financial incentive to cling to a deal that is now tarnishing its global reputation. Supporter groups and human rights advocates have urged Arsenal to take a stand, arguing that continuing to promote “Visit Rwanda” in the midst of a humanitarian crisis is morally indefensible.

With diplomatic tensions rising and the UK government openly questioning Rwanda’s conduct, Arsenal’s reluctance to engage with the DRC’s concerns is becoming increasingly untenable.

The club now faces a defining moment: ignore the criticism and risk further reputational damage, or acknowledge the gravity of the situation and sever its ties with Rwanda before the pressure becomes insurmountable.

The deal is not due to end until next year.

Related Posts